An electric vehicle charger is being unveiled in a Concord parking lot Wednesday and it’s gathering a lot of attention for a very odd reason: It’s really slow.
“The reality is that cars are parked over 90% of the time. This is a great way to harness that concept of passive charging, to be topping off the battery” said Ross Bloom, founder of the Somerville, Mass.-based company Revvit, which made the unit being put into a Storrs Street parking lot as a test. “This is a huge opportunity to move away from the gas station mentality, to leverage the benefit of EVs that you can charge anywhere you’re parked.”
Most public EV chargers are the type known as Level 2 or Level 3. These do a good job of filling up the tank, so to speak – a Level 3 charger like Tesla’s Supercharger can add 200 miles of range in 15 minutes – but they’re expensive and hard to install because they require special, beefed-up power connections. New Hampshire, which unlike neighboring states does little to support EV charging, has very few of these public chargers.
The Revvit system, on the other hand, is a Level 1 charger, the equivalent of plugging into a wall socket, so it can be put almost anywhere without much fuss or expense.
“This enables you to scale up, to reach a lot more folks with EV charging, rather than a limited infrastructure,” Ross said.
The trickle of electricity from a Level 1 charger increases an EV’s range by only a few miles every hour. That makes it useless for a quick fill-up but perfectly fine if the car is sitting in one spot for a long time. Many EV owners charge their car every night from a household socket, avoiding the cost of installing a Level 2 charger.
Ross envisions multiple Level 1 chargers being installed in areas where cars regularly sit for hours, such as at airports, ski areas and downtown parking garages, or by businesses in their employee lot. It will probably be used as a free amenity to lure customers or workers because it is cheap to install and uses a small amount of electricity, he said.
“I think in general the places that we’re targeting are going to be thinking about something that they bake into the cost of the parking, to attract people,” he said.
Not charging for use also makes the system much simpler to build and operate, with drivers not needing to use apps or QR codes.
The Concord charger, in the parking lot behind the Bank of America at 124 Storrs Street, will be free to use.
Ross said the Concord unit, like one near Loon Mountain Ski Area, is a prototype. The company is in the very early stages of “bootstrapped” financing with just two employees. “We’re using these pilots to help get the conversation going with investors,” he said.
Ross, who grew up in eastern Massachusetts, says he often come to New Hampshire to go skiing. He credited CleanEnergy New Hampshire with connecting him with Foxfire Property Management, which owns the parking area.
Concord developer Steve Duprey, president of Foxfire, is slated to be at a ribbon cutting for the charger Wednesday at 12:30 p.m., 124 along with Ross, Concord Mayor Byron Champlin and others.
The Revvit follows the argument that public EV charging shouldn’t be thought of as the equivalent of gas stations – places that we visit only occasionally when we want to fill up – but the equivalent of old-fashioned watering troughs for horses.
Before cars existed watering troughs were all over the place, in front of businesses, at parks, along streets. Horses pulling carts or coaches weren’t expected to drink their fill at any one trough but to use many of them as their owners went about their daily business, quenching their thirst a bit at a time with the expectation that they could get a bit more water at their next stop.
Building lots of public chargers, even slow Level 1 chargers, would allow car owners to do the same, adding a few miles at each stop so they never run out of electricity.
Installing a new level I outlet costs around $300, and a level II one costs about $1500. Simply providing an outlet of either type would be very useful for most EV drivers, as most have an adapter that can plug in – whether it be level I or level II. Simple is good.
Over a workday, the level II charger could serve five or six cars, giving them each an average of 20 percent more charge (a typical long commute). The level I charger would give a single car about half that amount. So the efficiency of providing level II outlets is pretty big.
But the expensive part of chargers comes probably because they’re not just open outlets in public. The commerce system running it, coupled with high-end charging adapter cords will cost thousands.
The “normal” level I outlets make sense if the institution installing them intends to let them be used for free, as in the bank parking lot in the story. The level I flow helps ensure that the electricity costs would not be too expensive (about $2 per day). It would be a nice employee perk, but wouldn’t be of much use to the customer visiting. If they’re spending thousands on a true charger though, with a commerce platform and a couple cords that go to the cars, then it makes much more sense to pop that on a 48-amp level II service.
I have several times gotten into the situation where I just needed 5 or 10 more miles to get me home. A charger such as this would be a big help. I also like the helping hand for any EV passing by philosophy. David Erickson Weare New Hampshire
In Fairbanks, Alaska there are electrical outlets on posts in front of each parking space at the University parking lots. These are to plug in the car’s head bolt heater so the cars will start when it is very cold. Free.
The same simple system could work for slow ev chargers at business parking lots – they would be an employee perk.
I suppose for the general public, you would want to attach some fee, but it would not be much. My brother says keeping his Tesla plugged in at his house is adding only a trivial amount to his monthly electric bill.
My (poorly informed) guess is that the cost and complication of building and maintaining a fee-collection system won’t be worth it for Level 1.