Going through a footlocker of old newspaper clips, I found this Science Briefs package that I wrote in the April 9, 1989, edition of the Nashua Telegraph, when I was an editor for the Sunday paper and its Sci/Tech section. This 34-year-old piece might be the first time I wrote “climate change” in a news article, although probably not the first time I had edited an article with the phrase.
The alarming predictions from the New Scientists article I was quoting – “crops will wither, rivers will run dry” and melting ice caps will threaten coastal cities and drown islands – drew a lot of scoffing at the time but seem prosaic now. After all, they’re actually happening: The Pacific nation of Tuvalu is struggling right now with the very problem that the article mentions.
If only we had listened to ourselves back then.
You’ll notice that I still had to hedge things, writing “If scientists are correct …” It was a few years before I told bosses that there wasn’t any question about climate change and I wasn’t going to pretend there was.
Also notice the second article, from AP, about “tilt-rotor” aircraft then being developed. The resulting V-22 Osprey has been around for decades now but it has a checkered safety record and drones are making it irrelevant.
Incidentally, the science-briefs package was the predecessor to my weekly column, still going strong in its 32nd year, which was the predecessor of this blog/newsletter. In fact, you could consider the Granite Geek blog as a “science briefs” package in the Internet era. I guess my job hasn’t changed as much as I think it has.
We moved to NH in 2000. One of the early NHPR interviews I heard was with a climate scientist discussing the impact of increasing temperatures on sugar maples (gonna kill ’em). His suggestion was to start a ‘Save the Maples’ campaign and maybe then people would get engaged. Sadly, no. Enjoy your syrup while you can.
When is Tuvalu suppose to start losing land area?
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/TUV/tuvalu/surface-area-km says it’s been 30.0 km^2 since at least 1961.
Thanks for raising the alarm on climate change for so long. We should all be spreading that word.
But let me address one slightly off-topic matter from this blog post (although you did “open the door”).
Admittedly the V-22 Osprey has had some problems related to it’s non-traditional design (I was gonna write “revolutionary design”, hah!), its safety record is such that it’s in regular use by our Armed Services, up to and including using it from time to time as “Marine One” for carrying the President.
And I’m wondering what mission of the V-22 is being taken over by drones?