Baseball is boring and getting boring-er, and people aren’t watching it.
Fortunately, I have the solution, which I first put forward two summers ago. To save you clicking through to the column, I’ll reprint it here:
This column is for geeks, who like innovative ideas that upend stodgy old industries, so to celebrate Fourth of July wanted to come up with an idea that will upend something traditionally American.
Since mom and apple pie are fine as they are, I decided to upend baseball, which is certainly stodgy and old. I suggest we use the Coriolis effect.
No, wait – hear me out. This is actually quite brilliant.
Here is my idea: Let batters run the bases either clockwise or counter-clockwise as they see fit, just as hurricanes spin clockwise or counter-clockwise depending on the hemisphere (that’s the Coriolis effect).
It’s a simple change, but it would upend the whole game, turning the schlerotic tedium-fest of modern baseball into an exciting, direction-agnostic thrill.
It works like this.
If no other runner is already on base, when you get a hit you can sprint either to first base or to third base – your choice. Once on base, you have to continue going in the same direction for the rest of the inning, touching all four bases to score a run. And if a teammate is already on base ahead of you, you have to run the bases in the same direction that they did.
That’s it, but what a difference it would make.
Infielders’ jobs would become much more complicated – no more first basemen with the mobility of the Old Man of the Mountain – and outfielders trying to throw out base runners will have to develop a good memory for rotational geometry: Is that guy on second advancing to the left or right?
Batting will also be more complicated, with another whole set of decisions to make as that ball flies toward your head at 92 mph.
And new statistics – what joy! Sports-stats geeks will go crazy, divvying up the batting and fielding averages into clockwise and counter-clockwise categories, arguing endlessly and upending their fantasy teams.
Colorful baseball terms will blossom, too. I suggest we take a cue from the mnemonic for tightening and loosening bolts: Batters who like running the traditional pattern will be call “righty-tighty” and those who prefer running clockwise will be “lefty-loosey.”
I’ve even turned it into a song, demonstrating that I know the name of at least one famously hard-to-anticipate pitcher:
Will they run righty-tighty or lefty-loosey?
It’ll keep you guessing like Gossage (Goose-y)
Or deciphering Ricky on “I Love Lucy”
A good rule change? Hey, it’s a doozey!
Admittedly, this wouldn’t go over well with baseball purists, the folks who are still huffy about the use of designated hitters, synthetic fabrics and electric lights. But we’re geeks and we think outside the box (or, in this case, the diamond), so we don’t care about them.
We want innovation. We want novelty. We want to be less bored when we go to Fenway Park and whatever-it’s-called stadium in Manchester.
Is that too much to ask? Not in America, it isn’t!
Call the Major League Baseball commissioner (212-931-7800) today. The future of America’s pastime is in your hands.
If you really need to be a purist, why not revert back to the original rules as written by ‘Doc’ Adams of Mont Vernon. None of those sissy gloves and allowing the ball to bounce once before catching. To check out this exciting old game, come to Lamson Farm Day on the 28th of September for a game played with the old rules.
David, David, David. Baseball is not boring. It’s only boring to people who don’t like baseball. And it’s OK if you don’t like baseball.
But let’s not damage the game (any more than it’s already been damaged over the years) in order to make it more interesting for people who don’t even like baseball.
To those of us who like baseball, it’s a terrific game. If you don’t like baseball, that’s OK, there are other sports. But let’s stop damaging the game that so many of us have loved just as it’s been for many many years.
I’m a baseball fan, Jack – have been since the Braves were in Boston. The trouble is these days is that the games are four hours long! Too many pitching changes, too many 12 pitch at bats, too much stepping out of the box and/or not throwing the g.d. ball!I
They have to do something to speed up the game, not let batters decide which base to run to.
Apparently, however, there are fewer of your type of baseball fan each year. That’s the issue.
That’s not a new idea and is how some of the earliest writings about the game describe it being played
Really? Cool! Are any sources online, do you know?
There was an efficient one-pitch softball league in Manchester, back around 1980 I think. The one pitch was either a hit or a strike-out. My friend played regularly and said the innings and games went pretty fast, and got the players to the beer quicker too.
Now, how about shorter periods for other slow sports, like football? Back to 9 holes only for golf?