Every few years attention returns to geothermal power in the U.S. – as with this excellent recent overview from Vox’s David Roberts, who says it is “”poised for a big breakout.” – which gives me an excuse to talk about how the Conway region is one of the most likely places for geothermal power in the Northeast.
I mean real geothermal, which uses high underground temperatures to boil water that spins turbines and generates electricity. This contrasts with household “geothermal,” which is a heat-exchange system using stable underground temperatures to increase the efficiency of traditional heating and cooling systems.
True geothermal is prominent in parts of the world where magma comes relatively close to the surface, raising temperatures within reach of drilling rigs. That includes the American West, the Philippines and Iceland, which is the only place in the world where humans have caused a volcano, after a drill punctured a pocket of underground lava.
The East Coast, which is geologically quiet, has always been a geothermal dud. So it was a big surprise back in 2007 when an MIT report identified the Conway area as the one spot east of the Mississippi where true geothermal might be financially feasible – not due to underground magma, but to natural radiation from New Hampshire’s signature stone.
Turns out, all the granite and related elements produces enough radioactivity deep underground to be potentially feasible. In fact, during the 1970s’ oil shocks, a “hot, dry rock” experiment was planned for Conway to determine the suitability of geothermal power but oil prices went down again so the study was canceled.
In 2017 the Department of Energy released a report about subsurface modeling, searching for good places for geothermal energy. (The report is here.) They didn’t mention Conway, but you can see it on the map shown above: it’s relatively red, as in more likely to produce geothermal energy.
I wouldn’t get too excited, though. In 2007, the MIT folks said if Conway tapped its geothermal energy, it would be the most expensive such site in the country because of the extreme depth needed to drill to get enough heat. Still, it claimed that New Hampshire geothermal could generate as much electricity as three Seabrook Stations which would certainly shake things up.
On the other hand, why not build three new Seabrook power plants? I realize we may not have a lot of seacoast on which to locate them, however, it would be a great source of carbon free energy and it would work well with the solar that only produces in the sunlight. Nuclear power can ramp up and down to provide the supply we all would like to have for our homes and businesses while addressing climate change. As a former nuclear power plant operator on Navy submarines, I know it can all be done safely.
What do we do with the waste?